Authoritative Texts: Media and Materiality
ATTR summer School in Oslo at the Norwegian School of Theology (MF), with field trips to the National Library and the Opera.
Photo: Hans A. Rosbach
There is no such thing as an un-mediated text. From the papyrus scroll to the internet, the medium has always been of profound importance to the formation, transmission, and reception of texts.
The 2017 ATTR summer school will explore how the medium and its materiality matter.
Multidisciplinary perspectives will be applied to the study of textual mediation, in both historical and contemporary contexts.
The fruitfulness of studying authoritative texts, and the way they have been received, in light of their material mediation will thus be demonstrated.
Research seminars and lectures by
- Prof. John D. Peters, Yale University: “Authoritative Texts, Paper Machines, and Media Theory"
- Prof. Liv Ingeborg Lied, Norwegian School of Theology: "Authoritative Texts: Media and Materiality "
- Prof. Kristin B. Aavitsland, Norwegian School of Theology: “The Authority of the Word in Ecclesiastical Space: Script, Image, Liturgy”
- Prof. Olav Torvund, Dep. Of Private Law, Law, University of Oslo: “Media and the Law: Freedom of Expression and Intellectual Property”
- Prof. Ellen Krefting, Dep. of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, Humanities, University of Oslo: “Practicing Enlightenment. The Role of Periodicals in Eighteenth Century Denmark-Norway”
- Academic skills: Postdoc.Fellow Mona Abdel-Fadil, Department of Media and Communication, Humanities, University of Oslo: “The Online Academic Persona”
- Interdisciplinary Insights: Prof. Hugo Lundhaug, Theology, University of Oslo, “Travelling Concepts: Challenges of Interdiscplinarity”
- Presentation by Stakeholder: Jana Weidemann, Ministry of Education and Research.
For more details, see program (pdf)
Prof. John D. Peters: “Authoritative Texts, Paper Machines, and Media Theory"
Much recent work in media theory has been fascinated with so-called paper-machines, i.e. the very diverse practices of data-storage, transmission and processing that stretch from scribal culture to digital computers. The notion of paper-machines portrays writing not only as a medium for preserving stories but also for changing and altering the world via practices such as counting, accounting, and calculating.
This lecture applies media-theoretic ideas about paper-machines to authoritative texts, focusing in particular on debates about canonicity and historicity in the Bible and the Book of Mormon. The latter, published in 1830 in the midst of a wider historicist and source-critical turn, and designed explicitly as a book in dialogue with the Bible’s authoritative status, is a case study that allows us to bridge media studies and the historical-critical study of scriptural traditions. At the same moment that the Bible was being historically relativized, the Book of Mormon presented a form of scripture that foregrounded the media-mechanics of scripture making.
Prof. Kristin B. Aavitsland, Norwegian School of Theology: “The Authority of the Word in Ecclesiastical Space: Script, Image, Liturgy”
The authority of scripture lies at the heart of Christian doctrine: in all cultures influenced by Christianity, the power of the written word is looming large. The cultural, social, and political consequences of this power are manifold. To study them implies an investigation of their mediation. The significance of the printing press for the spread of Protestant doctrine and its emphasis of scripture as sole authority is well known and often commented upon.
However, authoritative texts do not always come between two covers, and they are not always meant to be read or heard by its audience. In the Christian cultures of medieval Europe, the written word was no less authoritative than before the early modern media revolution, but its mediation was varied, and it was often framed by other practices than reading or listening. In this paper, I discuss the display of script and scripture in medieval church interiors, taking examples from twelfth-century Scandinavia as my cases. I comment on the inscriptions’ rhetoric, not only the verbal but also the visual, and on the mutual interplay between the two. Furthermore, I make a case for the value of graphicacy – the ability to read graphic representations – as a complementary dimension to literacy for the study of authoritative texts in historical cultures.
Prof. Ellen Krefting: “Practicing Enlightenment. The Role of Periodicals in Eighteenth Century Denmark-Norway”
What was the Enlightenment? What can we learn about this historical phenomenon by focusing on what Kant was doing when he published his “Answer to the question: What is Enlightenment” rather than on the way he defined Enlightenment in this authoritative text? Enlightenment studies have over the past decades moved from concentrating on ideas towards questioning when, where and in which forms, practices and media Enlightenment did occur. The new infrastructures and practices, the printed genres and formats developing in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries have come to the fore, highlighting what Siskin and Warner (2009) call the historically specific “mechanics of mediations” – without which the dissemination of enlightenment ideas and texts would not be possible.
In my presentation I will discuss how “mediation” – a concept rooted in the period itself – can open new venues for exploring and understanding Enlightenment as a capacious and also historically specific phenomenon. I will use my own research on the medium of periodicals in eighteenth century Denmark-Norway as a case in point. Inspired by Siskin and Warner and also by Darnton’s History of Books-perspectives I will address questions such as: How did the medium of periodicals develop in the particular context of Denmark-Norway? In what ways can local and short-lived periodicals be seen as mediating and practicing Enlightenment? How did the periodicals themselves reflect on the question of Enlightenment, and of mediation? To what extent can the Northern periphery offer a vantage point for considering Enlightenment as mediation?
Prof. Olav Torvund: “Media and the Law: Freedom of Expression and Intellectual Property”
The fundament of all media regulation is freedom of expression. Freedom of expression has its legal fundament in The European Convention on Human Rights art 10, and in Norway in art 100 in our constitution. Expressions can have many forms. Freedom of expression has its limitation, and the controversy is about where to draw the limits.
Intellectual property rights give the author the exclusive right to make copies of the work, and to make the work available to the public. The author’s exclusive rights must be balanced against the society’s interest in having access to knowledge and culture. Copyright protects to form, not the content. Facts and knowledge are free. We are free to, within some limitation, make copies of a work for private use, quote a work, and make a work available in teaching. Internationally, copyright is regulated in the Berne convention and in many EU Directives.
"Salome – Ever and Never the Same? Re-productions of a Canonized Opera"
The syllabus consists of required readings connected to each research seminar. In addition, each lecturer list additional, optional reading.
The workload of the seminar is stipulated to 5 ECTS credits.
We expect all participants to attend the whole week and every part of the program, June 12-16, 2017.
We also expect the participants to prepare a paper and responses, and to read the required reading before the seminar.
Please make sure that you can prioritise preparation and participation before you register.
In all seminars and summer schools, the PhD fellows’ own presentation of papers based on their dissertation work, with prepared responses by other PhD students, is central. The focus of the discussions will be primarily on methodological matters and interdisciplinary Insights.
Paper: May 22, 2017
Written responses: June 5, 2017